Keyword summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Sam Houston results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 261 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (30,194 of 58,138 keywords). This Fort Sam Houston is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Fort Sam Houston
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠49%Fort Sam Houston (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos