Keyword summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fishermen results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,192 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (25,111 of 59,653 keywords). This Fishermen is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Fishermen
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠58%Fishermen (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,192
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos