Keyword summary
50% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fda Approval results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,277 hits . Analysis detected 6,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,792 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (45,297 of 59,726 keywords). This Fda Approval is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Fda Approval
Keyword details
Total words: 10,792
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst