Keyword summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Care results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 2,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (41,973 of 55,284 keywords). This Family Care is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Family Care
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠25%Family Care (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos