Author summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alcynna Lloyd results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 2,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (6,343 of 8,944 authors). This Alcynna Lloyd is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Alcynna Lloyd
Author details
Total words: 4,132
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst