Keyword summary
77%2 analyzed articles/videos1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Controversy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 832 hits. Analysis detected 5,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,684 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (19,028 of 58,446 keywords). This Election Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Election Controversy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
68%Election Controversy (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,684
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos