Keyword summary
â 55% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economist results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,127 hits . Analysis detected 11,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,865 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 14% (45,706 of 53,030 keywords). This Economist is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Economist
Keyword details
Total words: 17,865
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst