Keyword summary
79% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Erica Schwartz results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,146 hits . Analysis detected 9,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,112 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 45% (33,103 of 59,653 keywords). This Dr. Erica Schwartz is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group. Dr. Erica Schwartz
Keyword details
Total words: 10,112
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst