Keyword summary
85% 42 analyzed articles/videos 14,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dodgers results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 6,481 hits . Analysis detected 51,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,459 analyzed words across 42 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (45,573 of 59,653 keywords). This Dodgers is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Dodgers
Keyword details
Total words: 61,459
Article count: 42
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score42 analyzed articles61.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst