Keyword summary
91% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democrats Elections results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 6,613 hits . Analysis detected 55,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,016 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (30,346 of 53,588 keywords). This Democrats Elections is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Democrats Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 51,016
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles51K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst