Author summary
72% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Pinedo results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 3,976 hits . Analysis detected 32,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,640 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,958 of 9,207 authors). This Peter Pinedo is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Peter Pinedo
Author details
Total words: 34,640
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles34.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst