Keyword summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Hart results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 2,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (2,342 of 59,385 keywords). This Daniel Hart is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. Daniel Hart
Keyword details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.1% percentile 9.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 35.6% 35.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 25.3% 25.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.5% 18.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 35.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst