Author summary
95% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelly McClure results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 1,929 hits . Analysis detected 8,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,132 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 93% (694 of 9,471 authors). This Kelly McClure is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Kelly McClure
Author details
Total words: 4,132
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.7% percentile 6.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 46.7% 46.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.5% 14.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.1% 15.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 20.6% 20.6% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 12.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst