Keyword summary
⁠10%3 analyzed articles/videos2,407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclospora Outbreak results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 536 hits. Analysis detected 1,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,147 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (56,492 of 57,547 keywords). This Cyclospora Outbreak is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Cyclospora Outbreak
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠2%Cyclospora Outbreak (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,147
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.8% percentile
0.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos