Keyword summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyberattacks-And-Hacks results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 100 hits . Analysis detected 862 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (43,687 of 55,050 keywords). This Cyberattacks-And-Hacks is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Cyberattacks-And-Hacks
Keyword details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst