Author summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maxwell Zeff results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 169 hits . Analysis detected 1,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,026 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,651 of 9,213 authors). This Maxwell Zeff is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Maxwell Zeff
Author details
Total words: 5,026
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst