Author summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Greenberg results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,977 hits . Analysis detected 13,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,276 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (7,244 of 9,459 authors). This Andy Greenberg is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Andy Greenberg
Author details
Total words: 22,276
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles22.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst