Keyword summary
68%2 analyzed articles/videos1,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cox Enterprises results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 2,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (18,973 of 59,653 keywords). This Cox Enterprises is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Cox Enterprises
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
69%Cox Enterprises (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos