Keyword summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos3,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Copper Theft results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,338 hits. Analysis detected 10,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,004 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (32,386 of 53,540 keywords). This Copper Theft is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Copper Theft
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠40%Copper Theft (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,004
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos