Keyword summary
93% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conspiracy Theory results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,559 hits . Analysis detected 37,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,215 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 40% (35,942 of 59,748 keywords). This Conspiracy Theory is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Conspiracy Theory
Keyword details
Total words: 34,215
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles34.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst