Keyword summary
ā 99% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Football Playoff results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , In-Group Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,715 hits . Analysis detected 20,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,789 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (17,288 of 56,188 keywords). This College Football Playoff is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. College Football Playoff
Keyword details
Total words: 12,789
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst