Author summary
35%2 analyzed articles/videos601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ray Brewer results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Anchoring Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 1,272 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,604 of 9,118 authors). This Ray Brewer is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Ray Brewer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
50%Ray Brewer (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate