Keyword summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clinton Scandal Manual results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 1,551 hits . Analysis detected 8,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (5,410 of 58,257 keywords). This Clinton Scandal Manual is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Clinton Scandal Manual
Keyword details
Total words: 3,536
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.7% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 43.9% 43.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 20.3% 20.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 43.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Red Herring: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst