Keyword summary
79%2 analyzed articles/videos540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citadel Securities results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 1,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,160 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 80% (12,137 of 59,653 keywords). This Citadel Securities is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Citadel Securities
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
80%Citadel Securities (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,160
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.4%14.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate