Keyword summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 735 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China AI results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 418 hits . Analysis detected 2,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (22,419 of 58,446 keywords). This China AI is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. China AI
Keyword details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst