Keyword summary
56%5 analyzed articles/videos4,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cancer Risk results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 1,002 hits. Analysis detected 10,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,666 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (45,135 of 59,137 keywords). This Cancer Risk is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Cancer Risk
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
24%Cancer Risk (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,666
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate