Author summary
ā 42% 4 analyzed articles/videos 815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Yim results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 282 hits . Analysis detected 1,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,870 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 59% (3,909 of 9,471 authors). This Matthew Yim is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Matthew Yim
Author details
Total words: 2,870
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst