Keyword summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Avengers Endgame results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Hindsight Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.6% saturation with 1,239 hits . Analysis detected 4,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 77% (14,294 of 59,742 keywords). This Avengers Endgame is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Avengers Endgame
Keyword details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 34.6% 34.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst