Keyword summary
47% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atlanta Beltline results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 3,094 hits . Analysis detected 8,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,460 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (43,526 of 58,540 keywords). This Atlanta Beltline is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Atlanta Beltline
Keyword details
Total words: 14,460
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst