Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anti Weaponization Bill results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.7% saturation with 1,649 hits. Analysis detected 8,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 95% (3,123 of 59,653 keywords). This Anti Weaponization Bill is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Anti Weaponization Bill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
95%Anti Weaponization Bill (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,672
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.8% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 61.7%61.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 52.0%52.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 24.8%24.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 24.2%24.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 21.0%21.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 61.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 52.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 21.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos