Keyword summary
90%3 analyzed articles/videos766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Spending results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 636 hits. Analysis detected 3,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,064 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 80% (11,660 of 57,321 keywords). This AI Spending is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
AI Spending
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
80%AI Spending (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,064
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos