Keyword summary
76% 11 analyzed articles/videos 13,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adriano Espaillat results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 6,482 hits . Analysis detected 62,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,459 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (39,188 of 59,653 keywords). This Adriano Espaillat is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Adriano Espaillat
Keyword details
Total words: 64,459
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles64.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst