Keyword summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Wingard results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 2,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (17,210 of 56,458 keywords). This Adam Wingard is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Adam Wingard
Keyword details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.2% 18.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst