Keyword summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 14 Peaks Nothing Is Impossible results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 351 hits . Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (8,707 of 59,756 keywords). This 14 Peaks Nothing Is Impossible is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. 14 Peaks Nothing Is Impossible
Keyword details
Total words: 1,648
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.4% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 21.3% 21.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst