Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wilko Martínez-Cachero results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 341 hits . Analysis detected 1,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,342 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,853 of 9,471 authors). This Wilko Martínez-Cachero is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Wilko Martínez-Cachero
Author details
Total words: 2,342
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.4% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 14.6% 14.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 14.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 14.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst