Author summary
29% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,315 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler A. McNeil results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 466 hits . Analysis detected 2,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,152 of 8,528 authors). This Tyler A. McNeil is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Tyler A. McNeil
Author details
Total words: 5,260
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst