Author summary
13%2 analyzed articles/videos1,819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roger Hannigan Gilson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 2,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,276 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (7,596 of 8,528 authors). This Roger Hannigan Gilson is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Roger Hannigan Gilson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
11%Roger Hannigan Gilson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,276
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos