Author summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim De Chant results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 715 hits . Analysis detected 7,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,952 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (6,066 of 9,471 authors). This Tim De Chant is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Tim De Chant
Author details
Total words: 8,952
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst