Author summary
68%2 analyzed articles/videos215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stevie Bonifield results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,340 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,430 of 8,572 authors). This Stevie Bonifield is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Stevie Bonifield
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
72%Stevie Bonifield (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,340
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.1%8.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate