The Verge70%

Now you can securely link multiple phones to one Signal account 21%

By Stevie Bonifield69%

8/4/2026, 3:02:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Loss Aversion, and Halo Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 291 faulty-reasoning hits from 172 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,420 of 28,112 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the article peer group.

You can link more devices with one phone number on Signal now, including an Android phone or iPhone. 
Signal already supported linking PCs and iPads, but not additional phones. 
When you link a device on Signal, you can check and respond to new messages across all of your linked devices. 
You can also choose whether or not to transfer an end-to-end encrypted copy of your previous messages to each newly linked device to mitigate the risk of devices that might be shared, lost, or compromised. 
The update is rolling out now with Signal version 8.20 on Android and version 8.22 for iPhone / iPad. 
Signal also says it has made “significant interface improvements to better support large devices,” including several improvements for foldable phones, which helped enable support for Android tablets. 
However, Signal says the large-screen version of its Android app is “still a work in progress,” and that it’s working on optimizing the interface for its Chromebook app, as well. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.4%The Verge: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.8%The Verge: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 4.4%The Verge: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.0%The Verge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.6%The Verge: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 3.1%The Verge: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Stevie Bonifield: 3.1%The Verge: 5.1%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 20.3%Stevie Bonifield: 2.2%The Verge: 0.8%Loss Aversion20.3%This article: 10.5%Stevie Bonifield: 1.6%The Verge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 23.8%Stevie Bonifield: 8.2%The Verge: 3.7%Optimism Bias23.8%This article: 37.8%Stevie Bonifield: 3.7%The Verge: 2.1%Pessimism Bias37.8%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 8.4%The Verge: 8.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 6.4%The Verge: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.8%The Verge: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 2.1%The Verge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Stevie Bonifield: 2.8%The Verge: 2.4%Halo Effect15.7%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 2.2%The Verge: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.1%The Verge: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.7%Stevie Bonifield: 1.9%The Verge: 3.2%Appeal to Authority15.7%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.4%The Verge: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 4.4%The Verge: 5.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 6.4%Stevie Bonifield: 0.7%The Verge: 0.2%Red Herring6.4%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.7%The Verge: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.2%The Verge: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.5%The Verge: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 4.8%The Verge: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.7%The Verge: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.7%Stevie Bonifield: 2.4%The Verge: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.7%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.4%The Verge: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 4.0%The Verge: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.4%Stevie Bonifield: 4.5%The Verge: 9.1%Biased Writer Voice6.4%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 1.2%The Verge: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stevie Bonifield: 0.0%The Verge: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Stevie Bonifield: 2.5%The Verge: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.5%

172 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.