Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Siobhan McAndrew results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 1,566 hits . Analysis detected 3,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,878 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,543 of 8,946 authors). This Siobhan McAndrew is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Siobhan McAndrew
Author details
Total words: 5,878
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 26.6% 26.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 26.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst