Author summary
66% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Selena Fragassi results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 3,787 hits . Analysis detected 17,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,994 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,653 of 9,293 authors). This Selena Fragassi is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Selena Fragassi
Author details
Total words: 21,994
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles22K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst