Review: Smashing Pumpkins brings Olivia Rodrigo, Yungblud to Lolla 65%

By Selena Fragassi64%

7/31/2026, 8:55:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 1,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 780 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (9,572 of 26,852 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the article peer group.

The Smashing Pumpkins came to shakedown 1994. 
That was the last time Chicago’s alt-rock heroes played Lollapalooza, back when it was still touring around the country and not yet in the band’s backyard. 
Headlining the festival again 32 years later was about recognizing that past while moving into a new era and a new audience for the band  and proving they very much still had a place on the lineup. 
The Pumpkins kicked things off with a succession of three of their biggest hits (“1979,” “Bullet with Butterfly Wings” and “Today”) to rope in the audience and then sashayed three guest stars for even more likeability. 
The spread was a cross-generational split that smartly catered to both the Day 1 fans as well as the new listeners not born in the 1900s, both of whom were seen in the respectable crowd that chose the set over Charli xcx. 
The Smashing Pumpkins perform at the Bud Light stage at Lollapalooza on July 31, 2026. 
Ashlee Rezin/Sun-Times 
Yungblud was up first. 
The spirited UK rocker has been a recent compadre of the band, featuring them on his song “Zombie.” 
But Friday they switched things up with Yungblud doing a reverent take of “Luna,” with his honeyed vocals giving a more polished take on the song. 
Then there was Olivia Rodrigo. 
The “Sour” star had been spotted at O’Hare on Thursday by internet sleuths, leading to speculation she was going to be doing something at Lollapalooza. 
Guesting with the Pumpkins was a natural fit. 
Rodrigo has always worn her love for ‘90s alt-rock on her sleeve  whether touring with the Breeders or, last year, bringing out Weezer for her own headlining set at the festival . 
Corgan looked downright smitten to be doing a slowed-down, acoustic duet of “Thirty-Three” with the pop star who brought a heightened emotion to the track. 
The final Pumpkins guest was none other than the band’s one-time bassist Melissa Auf der Maur, who has been back on the radar lately with her tell-all ‘90s memoir, “Even the Good Girls Will Cry.” 
She ripped through a scorching version of “The Everlasting Gaze” and fit in so well with the band  of course, also including founding guitarist James Iha and drummer Jimmy Chamberlin  that you only hope they find a way to properly reunite in the future. 
No disregard to touring bassist Jack Bates, of course, who held his own during the 17-song set, as did touring guitarist Kiki Wong, whose whiplash solo on “Ava Adore” was next level. 
All of it was a fitting way to close out “Pumpkinpalooza” that has blanketed the city over the past few days. 
In addition to the band’s warm-up show at Riviera Wednesday night (also featuring Auf der Maur and “Brady Bunch” actor Barry Williams on a random cover of “It’s A Sunshine Day”), there was a pop-up merch store on Wabash Avenue selling crossover designs merging the Pumpkins and the Chicago Cubs. 
Corgan and his kids paid a visit to the shop Friday before it closed for good. 
His family  including wife Chloe Mendel  has also been helping to run the Madame Zuzu’s Celestial Lounge pop-up in Lolla’s Vibe Village where they’ve been selling goods from their Highland Park tea shop. 
If there’s one thing you have to give to the Pumpkins, it’s the fact that they’ve always stayed close to their Chicago roots. 
The band never left home for the coasts as so many did in the halcyon days, and anytime they play our fair city, it’s done with the utmost love and consideration for the place that raised them. 
There’s one moment in the set that always drives this home. 
When the band plays “Tonight Tonight,” it feels like a birth right to shout the famous “city by the lake” lyric. 
Except Friday night, fans did so right next to Lake Michigan, making it even more meaningful. 
Nature got the memo  as the band played the song, a sudden burst of rain blanketed the crowd like a ritualistic baptism. 
The Smashing Pumpkins perform on Day 2 of Lollapalooza in Grant Park on Friday. 
“We just got a rain disco party,” said Corgan, before shifting gears. 
“All right, back to the sorrow,” he declared, launching into the gloomy psych rocker “Pentagrams.” 
But he couldn’t fool anyone  Corgan was enjoying the night just as much as everyone else in the park. 
We all felt right at home. 
Bullet With Butterfly Wings 
Luna (with Yungblud) 
Porcelina of the Vast Oceans 
Thirty-Three (with Olivia Rodrigo) 
War Dreams of Itself 
The Everlasting Gaze (with Melissa Auf der Maur) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.2%Selena Fragassi: 2.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.6%Confirmation Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Selena Fragassi: 3.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.1%Availability Heuristic2.3%This article: 5.4%Selena Fragassi: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 1.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 1.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Selena Fragassi: 3.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.4%Framing Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.7%Selena Fragassi: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Selena Fragassi: 1.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.2%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Selena Fragassi: 4.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.3%Negativity Bias2.6%This article: 2.9%Selena Fragassi: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 1.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.2%Selena Fragassi: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias3.2%This article: 3.5%Selena Fragassi: 2.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Selena Fragassi: 8.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.2%Halo Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 1.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.5%Selena Fragassi: 5.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Hasty Generalization5.5%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.6%Selena Fragassi: 3.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 1.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Begging the Question1.0%This article: 0.9%Selena Fragassi: 2.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.9%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.9%Selena Fragassi: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.9%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.9%Selena Fragassi: 4.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.0%Anecdotal26.9%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Selena Fragassi: 1.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%Selena Fragassi: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Unattributed Quote3.5%This article: 1.5%Selena Fragassi: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 40.9%Selena Fragassi: 17.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice40.9%This article: 4.7%Selena Fragassi: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%Indoctrination4.7%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Selena Fragassi: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Selena Fragassi: 1.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.9%

780 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers5.4%attributed speech738writer words
Selected voice

Billy Corgan

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words64% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Billy Corgan: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+44.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Billy Corgan: 44.4%44.4%Biased Writer Voice-43.2 ptsWriter: 43.2%Billy Corgan: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Billy Corgan: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Billy Corgan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.