Author summary
60% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Perez results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,117 hits . Analysis detected 10,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,212 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,580 of 9,347 authors). This Sarah Perez is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Sarah Perez
Author details
Total words: 12,212
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst