Author summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Dempster results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 705 hits . Analysis detected 2,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,521 of 8,706 authors). This Sarah Dempster is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Sarah Dempster
Author details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.5% 26.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst