Richard E Grant’s Very Modern Odyssey review  far more thrilling than the Christopher Nolan borefest 67%

By Sarah Dempster79%

8/2/2026, 1:00:30 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 1,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 666 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (10,193 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the article peer group.

Here comes Richard E Grant, pounding towards us in his tiny leather jacket as he gesticulates wildly at his cobbled surrounds. 
“Wow,” he gasps. 
“Look at that.” 
We look at that. 
It’s Malta. 
Specifically, Malta’s Grand Harbour: a sobbingly beautiful gateway to the Mediterranean and the sun-blessed starting line for Richard E Grant’s Very Modern Odyssey, a four-part travelogue “inspired by Homer’s hero” in which the veteran actor traces Odysseus’s “incredible journey” while wearing a succession of increasingly voluminous linen trousers. 
Said tracing is not, however, an exact science. 
This is not one of those awful celebrity things in which our noble hero arms himself with set squares and a scholastic scowl before setting sail on a “voyage” to uncover “the truth”. 
Nor is it an attempt to contribute to the seemingly interminable Odyssey discourse  the ongoing hoo-ha over the historical accuracy of the Christopher Nolan blockbuster that already feels as if it’s lasted longer than the Trojan war. 
Instead, it’s a loose-limbed, easygoing thing that attempts to separate Homeric myth from reality but appears equally “chill” with the fact that much of it remains fundamentally unknowable. 
“Essentially,” says Grant, grinning hugely, “we’re dealing with an act of the imagination.” 
So here we are in the Maltese capital of Valletta, which doesn’t appear to have featured on Odysseus’s itinerary, but does have a Michelin-starred restaurant that serves butter-basted pigeon with sage and rosemary. 
Grant is cock-a-hoop. 
“Mmm,” he shouts while frantically licking his plate, much as the Greeks “licked” the Trojans after the siege of Troy. 
This is followed by a brief stop at the luxurious Phoenicia hotel for a lime mocktail and some wistful reminiscing about Malta’s colonial past (“this was Queen Elizabeth’s favourite hangout!”), before it’s off for a gander at Valletta’s perfectly extraordinary St John’s Co-Cathedral. 
“I’ve never seen anything like this in my life,” splutters our host, drifting through the nave open-mouthed as he takes in its baroque tumult of golden whorls and thunderstruck cherubim. 
“Honestly, it out-Sistines the Sistine Chapel.” 
And it does. 
Built by the Order of St John in the 16th century, it’s a frantic masterpiece of death and glory, its ornate marble floor housing the tombs of 400 “warrior knights”. 
“In Homer’s world,” says Grant, “heroes make a sacrifice to the gods every time they sail into danger. 
Here, the ritual was different, but the idea was the same: ask for help before you do something terrifying.” 
The actor is moved. 
“I’m not a religious man,” he tells us later, chin smushed into his enormous brown neckerchief. 
“But going inside that jewel of a church was one of the most beautiful experiences I’ve ever had.” 
Here, there are epiphanies around every corner. 
Valletta’s Lurpak-coloured stonework is “a revelation”. 
The cave on the Maltese island of Gozo that may or may not have been the inspiration for the home of the saucy nymph Calypso leaves him “nearly in tears”. 
“I’m utterly bewitched by every detail,” he roars at one point. 
He is a one-man brass section of patrician glee. 
These days, we note, there is a slight fuzziness to Grant’s barrel-aged boom, as if his vowels had rolled under a chaise longue and been left to gather a fine layer of fluff. 
When he reads extracts from Homer’s poem in the ruins of an amphitheatre, he sounds both wearily thrilled and knackered, like a kindly oak tree completing a particularly taxing parkrun. 
The opening episode concludes with a visit to the bronze age ruins of Troy. 
This was “almost certainly” the site of “a real, bloody war”. 
Another huge grin from Grant. 
“It seems Homer blurred fact and fiction into a story that has lasted over two and a half thousand years,” he trumpets. 
“A success by any measure.” 
As, indeed, is Grant’s own Very Modern Odyssey. 
Lime mocktails all round. 
Richard E Grant’s Very Modern Odyssey is on Channel 4 now. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.8%Sarah Dempster: 0.8%the Guardian: 3.6%Confirmation Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 2.4%the Guardian: 3.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.0%Sarah Dempster: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 3.3%Sarah Dempster: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias3.3%This article: 1.7%Sarah Dempster: 1.5%the Guardian: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 6.6%Sarah Dempster: 3.3%the Guardian: 5.8%Framing Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.1%Sarah Dempster: 4.2%the Guardian: 2.4%Optimism Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Sarah Dempster: 7.7%the Guardian: 10.0%Negativity Bias7.4%This article: 2.7%Sarah Dempster: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 2.7%Sarah Dempster: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Sarah Dempster: 6.9%the Guardian: 2.9%Halo Effect13.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.6%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.3%Sarah Dempster: 3.1%the Guardian: 1.1%Recency Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 2.6%the Guardian: 1.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 5.0%Sarah Dempster: 3.7%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man5.0%This article: 8.9%Sarah Dempster: 3.8%the Guardian: 3.5%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 7.4%Sarah Dempster: 1.8%the Guardian: 1.6%False Dilemma7.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.8%Sarah Dempster: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.8%This article: 3.2%Sarah Dempster: 2.0%the Guardian: 6.0%Hasty Generalization3.2%This article: 5.7%Sarah Dempster: 1.4%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring5.7%This article: 1.2%Sarah Dempster: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.6%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 14.0%Sarah Dempster: 3.5%the Guardian: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion14.0%This article: 2.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.8%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 8.3%Sarah Dempster: 2.1%the Guardian: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 32.4%Sarah Dempster: 8.9%the Guardian: 3.0%Anecdotal32.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.5%Sarah Dempster: 1.9%the Guardian: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.3%Sarah Dempster: 1.6%the Guardian: 1.5%Unattributed Quote6.3%This article: 2.7%Sarah Dempster: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 43.1%Sarah Dempster: 26.5%the Guardian: 9.7%Biased Writer Voice43.1%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 2.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Dempster: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Sarah Dempster: 2.3%the Guardian: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.3%

666 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker27%attributed speech488writer words
Selected voice

Richard E Grant

91%flagged-word coverage
178 attributed words100% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Biased Writer Voice-58.8 ptsWriter: 58.8%Richard E Grant: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.7 ptsWriter: 12.7%Richard E Grant: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+10.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Richard E Grant: 10.1%10.1%Unattributed Quote-8.6 ptsWriter: 8.6%Richard E Grant: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.