Speaker summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard E. Grant results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 83.3% saturation with 38.333 hits. Analysis detected 84.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (15,070 of 45,144 speakers). This Richard E. Grant is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Richard E. Grant
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠67%Richard E. Grant (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 3.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos