Author summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 1,952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Verrelli results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 395 hits . Analysis detected 1,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,722 of 9,293 authors). This Samantha Verrelli is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Samantha Verrelli
Author details
Total words: 7,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.5% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% No True Scotsman: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst