Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruth Sherlock results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 4,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,986 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,556 of 8,806 authors). This Ruth Sherlock is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Ruth Sherlock
Author details
Total words: 3,986
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.3% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.1% 19.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 13.3% 13.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst