Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rory Doherty results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 1,120 hits . Analysis detected 4,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,558 of 8,777 authors). This Rory Doherty is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Rory Doherty
Author details
Total words: 3,828
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.3% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 29.3% 29.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.5% 15.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.3% 13.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst